Whose English Is It? Younglish!

In 1985 Kachru described the world of English in terms of three circles which were the inner (including countries in which English was spoken as the first language), outer (including countries where English had become an official or widely used second language) and the expanding (including countries where English was learnt as a foreign language).

However, now it can be seen that Kachru’s division has already lost its validity as the number of non-native speakers has surpassed the native ones and the majority of the competent English speakers are not native speakers but second language learners. So it can be claimed that the inner circle has lost its dominant linguistic power since English began to be used much more as a ‘Lingua Franca’ than as a native language.

As regards this changing aspect of the English Language, implications for teaching English have to be based also upon the recognition of it as a global language, and World Englishes must take the place of inner, outer and expanding Englishes because as well as native speakers, everyone speaking English has the ownership of the language as international shareholders. For this reason, I characterize English language teaching as ‘a specific pedagogy to develop proficiency of English as an international language or Lingua Franca by taking into consideration the demands of the global as well as local context, the culture of learning, and learner factors.’ So, in my opinion, the educators of English must no longer provide learners with target models of only one form of English used in inner circle countries but they must create and design their own pedagogies and materials according to their local cultures of learning by pursuing the position of English language as a lingua franca via global perspectives.

In terms of the methodology of teaching English as an international language, I claim no one single best method which will be appropriate to the context of teaching and the needs of the learners. Likewise; an eclectic approach, that is, teachers’ switching off between methods or absorbing the best techniques of all the methods to use in the most appropriate situations ignores the teachers’ professional on-the-moment decision-making skills according to their perceptions of their own teaching to create an effective language learning environment. It also lacks the necessary guidance about how to select and combine what parts of the methods according to what basis or principle. So it creates a tendency for the teachers to combine non-fitting or contradictory elements of a variety of methods thereby presenting an embedded but dysfunctional instruction.

For this reason, I think the best methodology to teach English is the one which is compliant with the teachers’ own perceptions of their teaching at any specific time for any given purpose; in other words, their sense of plausibility. So, any method can be exploited in different ways by different teachers according to the harmony between the method and some other factors of the learning contexts such as the culture of learning, official language policies, the role of English in society, the attitudes towards English as an international language, philosophy of learning as well as other factors regarding the teachers’ and learners’ profiles. This is actually the reason why the weak forms of Communicative Language Teaching are widely implemented in many societies today. It shows us that even if some methods or approaches suggest particular ways for the pedagogy of English language teaching, the local cultural expectations of the teaching contexts presuppose tailoring on the application of those methods on the basis of teachers’ sense of plausibility.

As a reason; the recognition of English as an international language for a myriad of cross-cultural communicative purposes must be escorted with its being embedded in a specific local context while designing an appropriate pedagogy. As Kramsch and Sullivan state (1996:211), “appropriate pedagogy must also be pedagogy of appropriation”.

It would be useful to define my perceptions of what language is in order to prescribe what an effective teaching is or must be. As an English language teacher, I think language is an individual, personal, social and interactive experience; it is not a single fixed entity but dynamic in terms of functions, places, contexts, personality, age, gender, cultures, history, groups, and individuality. So by “languaging” we create identities, distribute our politics, in other words “social goods”, present our worlds, build relations, exercise power, humanise or brutalize events, etc.

By using language we not only communicate information but also create “ways of existing” in the world by engaging in a real project- a social activity- with the aim of creating new affiliations and transforming old ones. We enact a particular social image and role as well as a specific discursive activity in and through language. Therefore, the aspect of language as both a personal and a social entity must be taken into account while teaching a particular language.

Since human beings are social creatures, they try to maximize the efficiency of communication by making it a shared and negotiated experience through use of language; thereby implicating that teaching of a specific language must be focused on form- function interplay and the pragmatic consequences of the interactions in meaningful contexts. So, effective teaching of a language must deal with the language beyond words and sentences and incorporate the multimodal representations of a variety of ways of “languaging”: visuals, images, music, sounds, colours, etc. in order to figure out how the different use of languaging can manipulate the way people think or perform.

For this reason, effective language teaching must improve the critical language awareness of the students by exposing them snippets of different “language in use” models taken from authentic texts or conversations. Then, the students also must be given chance to experience real interactions and deliver exchanges in the target language by the help of several semiotic models as resources of language. In that sense the teaching pedagogy must be oriented to negotiation of meanings and intentions in the target language by developing strategic and pragmatic competence in the students through liberating them to produce language via communicative tasks or activities.

Instead of rules, the instruction must be strategies-based and active learning must be given priority over knowledge-based learning through the use of activities requiring higher-order thinking skills and production. Teachers must spend efforts to prepare their learners to “receive” the language and be independent of classrooms, that is, to become autonomous learners.

And in order for learner autonomy to be developed, intrinsic motivation in the students must be sustained by giving them agency in their learning; enabling them to be doers rather than passive recipients of learning actions. For this to happen, first of all, the courses or lessons in their activities or tasks must be compatible with the goals and needs of the learners. They must also provide a model of language learning theory for students to apply their learning strategies for themselves.

The tasks must be similar to or replications of real communicative tasks which will create meaning for the students in doing them and preparing them to real-world interactions. Finally and most importantly, the instruction adopted must promote learners to reflect on their own learning thereby encouraging students to take over the responsibility and ownership of their own language learning process.

In order to prompt students to think about their own learning and improve metacognitive awareness teacher can prepare checklists with “can-do statements” and encourage reflection via making learners keep learning diaries, write learning journals or create vlogs or blogs as well as learning dossiers and portfolios.

Teacher must conduct and promote out-of-class activities and design self-access centres in the institutions (if it is possible) so as to stimulate learners to work on their own with a range of materials. As well as those issues, teacher must give chance to students to make choices about the method, activity, task or homework they will be assigned and teacher must negotiate with the students about the syllabus or curriculum design thereby making them intrinsically motivated towards their goals and purposes.

However for all those techniques to be successful and to create effective teaching; the teacher must be empowered, must be able to design and adapt his own materials according to the objectives of the lesson, must have moral behaviours, highly developed professional skills and must be autonomous himself/herself in order to be a role-model for the students.

As I also stated above, the main focus of language is to achieve specific communicative functions no matter it is written, oral, hypertextual, etc. and effective language teaching, in my opinion must develop communicative competences (grammatical, sociolinguistic, strategic, discourse competence) of the students. They must be taught rules of the discourse of particular social contexts and how language functions in specific discourses. For this aim, different meaningful contexts and genre-based and discourse-based instruction can be implemented for the learners to realize what kind of specific language uses in which context are appropriate and how textual properties act on the use of language to achieve different discursive functions.

The learners must be engaged in sociocultural aspects of language use via use of pre-communicative tasks which make the learners see the form-function relationships and be aware of the notion of ‘appropriacy’. Learning the uses of language and language itself must be embedded for the learners both to practice the form and learn how to use particular structures to apply specific functions of language. For this aim the instruction must be elaborated according to the communicative aims and needs of the learners and students must be seen as communicators above all.

Communicative and interactive pair-group works as well as information-gap/jigsaw activities based on authentic materials must be applied in the courses so as to make students actively engaged in negotiation of meaning and express themselves in the target language. So the students gain a chance to use the language and conduct true communication with a purpose.

They must also be given real or real-like problem-solving tasks for which they are engaged in cognitive processing while producing language and have a choice over what they will say and how. In this process errors must be seen as natural incomes of learning and communication and corrected later through some other accuracy-based activities. While assessing students, teacher must take into account both accuracy and fluency of the students and a collection of their works must be evaluated according to criterion-referenced assessment techniques.

Apart from the elements regarding instructional and pedagogical issues, effective teaching has some other components concerning the organizational, procedural and managerial issues. First of all, teacher must be well prepared and must be skilled to start and end a lesson in a well-organized way. He or she must have a varied repertoire of strategies and tools and extra materials to meet an unexpected case in the lesson. S/he must be talented enough in using paralinguistic devices, body movements, eye contact as well as tone of voice appropriately to sustain the motivation of learners, and give feedback.

The teacher must treat the students respectfully, be caring and tactful. Teacher must also continue to learn during his/her career and must reflect on his/her teaching by action researches, collaborative work or microteaching methods. S/he must be well-equipped to integrate technology in the lessons and adapt his teaching style or beliefs to the demands of the global and local context of the teaching. S/he must build positive rapport with the students and monitor the progress of each student and provide feedback accordingly. Finally s/he must personalize and humanize her/his pedagogies according to the interests, needs, and skills of the learners.

Facebook Yorumları
Fatma Karaca hakkında 13 makale
İngilizce Öğretmeni

İlk yorum yapan olun

Yorumunuz

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.